Elementos clínicos para el diagnóstico de apendicitis aguda en la atención primaria de salud

La apendicitis aguda se manifiesta, en ocasiones, con una variada e inespecífica presentación clínica, lo que dificulta su diagnóstico oportuno y favorece el riesgo de complicaciones. El objetivo es actualizar la información relacionada con las características clínicas de la apendicitis aguda, para lo que se realizó una revisión no sistemática de la literatura hasta abril del año 2022. Se revisaron artículos, libros especializados y citas bibliográficas de estudios elegidos, 20 de los cuales fueron seleccionados para la revisión. Mediante esta investigación se concluye que la primera y principal manifestación clínica es el dolor abdominal. El paciente debe someterse a una cuidadosa exploración física, incluyendo un examen rectal si lo precisa, y en las mujeres a un examen ginecológico si existiera duda diagnóstica.

Acute appendicitis is manifested, sometimes, with a varied and unspecific clinical presentation, which makes difficult its timely diagnosis and favors the complication risk. The objective is to update the information related to the clinical characteristics of acute appendicitis, for which a non-systematic review of the literature was carried out until April 2022. Articles, specialized books and bibliographic citations of selected studies were reviewed, 20 of which were chosen for the review. Through this research it is concluded that the first and main manifestation is abdominal pain. The patient should undergo a rigorous physical examination, including a rectal examination if necessary, and in the case of women, a gynecological examination if there is diagnostic doubt.

Mucocele apendicular benigno / Benign Appendiceal Mucocele

Introducción: El mucocele apendicular se considera una lesión rara del apéndice que se caracteriza por la dilatación de la luz del órgano con acumulación de moco. Este puede ser benigno o maligno. Objetivo: Caracterizar un caso de mucocele apendicular de comportamiento benigno en un paciente adulto masculino. Presentación del caso: Se asiste a un paciente, en estudio de tumor de vías digestivas, que se interviene quirúrgicamente con cuadro peritoneal agudo hallando masa de localización apendicular. Se realiza apendicectomía convencional y se estudia la pieza por anatomía patológica como mucocele apendicular benigno. La evolución del paciente fue satisfactoria. Conclusiones: Se presenta clínicamente de forma inespecífica, lo que posibilita que su diagnóstico sea intraoperatorio con mayor frecuencia. La estrategia quirúrgica depende de los hallazgos intraoperatorios donde la apendicectomía y la hemicolectomía derecha son las técnicas más utilizadas. El pseudomixoma peritoneal es una complicación temida(AU)

Introduction: Appendiceal mucocele is considered a rare lesion of the appendix characterized by dilatation of the organ lumen with mucus accumulation. It can be benign or malignant. Objective: To characterize a case of appendiceal mucocele with benign behavior in an adult male patient. Case presentation: A patient under study of digestive tract tumor is attended. The patient underwent surgery for having acute peritoneal symptoms; a mass of appendicular location was found. Conventional appendicectomy was performed and the piece was studied by pathological anatomy, being a benign appendicular mucocele. The patient's evolution was satisfactory. Conclusions: This condition is presented clinically in a nonspecific manner, which makes for its diagnosis to be more frequently intraoperative. The surgical strategy depends on the intraoperative findings, in which appendectomy and right hemicolectomy are the most used techniques. Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a feared complication(AU)

Meta analysis of the efficacy of umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis / 中华内分泌外科杂志

Objective:To analyze the effects of umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (U-LESS) and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLS) on the treatment of acute appendicitis in children by using Meta-analysis. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of U-LESS in treating acute appendicitis in children.Methods:The English databases Pubmed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, CNKI, Weipu Database, Wanfang Medical Network Database, CBM literature and other Chinese databases were retrieved, and the relevant literature of the comparative study of U-LESS and CLS in the treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis was found, and the quality analysis and application of the selected comparative studies were carried out. RevMan5.3 and stata software were employed to compare the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative intestinal recovery time, incision length, postoperative hospital stay time, postoperative complications, etc. of different surgical procedures.Results:A total of 19 literature were included in this study, and a total of 2133 cases were included, including 1021 cases in the U-LESS group and 1112 cases in the CLS group, all of which were retrospective case-control studies. Meta analysis showed that the operation time in U-LESS was shorter than that in CLS (95%CI [-9.05, -3.17], Z=4.07, P<0.001) , and the intraoperative bleeding volume of U-LESS was less than that of CLS (95%CI [-15.28, -5.01], Z=3.87, P<0.001) , incision length was shorter in U-LESS than in CLS (95%CI [-1.40, -1.27], Z=39.30, P<0.001) , the postoperative exhaust time of U-LESS was shorter than that of CLS (95%CI [-8.63, -5.89], Z=10.37, P<0.001) , and the recovery time after U-LESS was shorter than that after CLS (95% CI, 95% CI, P<0.001) . U-LESS and CLS did not differ significantly in postoperative length of stay (95%CI [-1.33, -0.64], Z=5.61, P<0.001) . U-LESS had fewer postoperative complications compared with CLS (95%CI [0.24,0.52], Z=5.27, P<0.001) . Conclusion:For pediatric acute appendicitis, U-LESS is safe and feasible, and has the advantages of shortening the operation time and reducing intraoperative bleeding.

Apendicetomía electiva: caso clínico y revisión de la bibliografía / Elective appendectomy: clinical case and literature review / Apendectomia eletiva: caso clínico e revisão da literatura

Las masas inflamatorias de origen apendicular son cuadros de presentación poco frecuente, el 3 % de las apendicitis agudas. Su manejo terapéutico puede ser sistematizado en cirugía de inicio o tratamiento conservador. Este último consiste en antibioticoterapia exclusiva, o asociada al drenaje percutáneo. Es una alternativa frente a emprender una apendicectomía demandante, con riesgo de no identificar el apéndice cecal, lesión visceral y necesidad de conversión o resecciones extendidas. Sin embargo, en estos pacientes, la ausencia de la confirmación diagnóstica anatomo-patológica obliga a un seguimiento protocolizado a fin de descartar diagnósticos diferenciales de mayor relevancia pronóstica. Objetivo: Presentar el caso de un paciente en el que se realizó manejo conservador y apendicetomía electiva. Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de las pautas de seguimiento e indicación de la apendicectomía electiva. Discusión y conclusiones: Las masas inflamatorias de origen apendicular representan un desafío diagnóstico y terapéutico, requiriendo un manejo y seguimiento específico. La indicación de apendicectomía electiva es controversial, es planteable frente a la persistencia de imágenes patológicas y dudas diagnósticas, o en pacientes con apendicitis recurrentes.

Inflammatory masses of appendiceal origin are infrequent; represent 3 % of acute appendicitis. Its therapeutic management can be systematized in initial surgery or conservative treatment. The latter consists of exclusive antibiotic therapy, or associated with percutaneous drainage. it is an alternative to undertaking a demanding appendectomy, with the risk of not identifying the cecal appendix, visceral injury, and the need for conversion or extended resections. However, the absence of pathological diagnostic confirmation requires protocolized follow-up in order to rule out differential diagnoses of greater prognostic relevance. Objective: present the case of a patient who underwent conservative management and elective appendectomy. a bibliographic review was carried out in the databases: pubmed, cochrane library, scielo and lilacs. Discussion and conclusions: inflammatory masses of appendiceal origin represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, requiring specific management and follow-up. The indication for elective appendectomy is controversial, it is considered in the presence of persistent pathological images and diagnostic doubts, or in patients with recurrent appendicitis.

Massas inflamatórias de origem apendicular são quadros de apresentação pouco frequentes, 3 % de as apendicites agudas. seu manejo terapêutico pode ser sistematizado em cirurgia inicial ou tratamento conservador. esta última consiste na antibioticoterapia exclusiva, ou associada à drenagem percutânea. é uma alternativa à realização de uma apendicectomia exigente, com risco de não identificação do apêndice cecal, lesão visceral e necessidade de conversão ou ressecções extensas. no entanto, nesses pacientes, a ausência de confirmação diagnóstica patológica requer acompanhamento protocolarizado para afastar diagnósticos diferenciais de maior relevância prognóstica. Objetivo: apresentar o caso de um paciente submetido a tratamento conservador e apendicectomia eletiva. foi realizada revisão bibliográfica nas bases de dados: pubmed, biblioteca cochrane, scielo e lilacs. Discussão e conclusões: as massas inflamatórias de origem apendicular representam um desafio diagnóstico e terapêutico, exigindo manejo e seguimento específicos. a indicação de apendicectomia eletiva é controversa, sendo considerada na presença de imagens patológicas persistentes e dúvidas diagnósticas, ou em pacientes com apendicite recorrente.

Trombosis de vena mesentérica superior como complicación de apendicitis aguda: una entidad poco frecuente / Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis as a complication of acute appendicitis: a rare entity

Las complicaciones de la apendicitis aguda ha sido ampliamente descrita en la literatura; la trombosis venosa mesenterica es una manifestación poco común de esta patologia correspondiento a menos del 1 % de frecuencia, esto puede desorientar al cirujano general al coexistir en el cuadro de apendicitis aguda. Presentamos el caso de un paciente masculino de 58 años, con dolor abdominal de 5 días de evolución, con sintomatologia poco especifica para el diagnóstico concreto de apendicitis. Se realizó una tomografía computarizada de abdomen con hallazgos de apendicitis aguda y trombososis venosa mesenterica con un coágulo de 11.5 cm. Se hizó también apendicectomia abierta y se inició anticoagulación al egreso hospitalario.

The complications of acute appendicitis have been widely described in the literature; Mesenteric venous thrombosis is a rare manifestation of this pathology corresponding to less than 1% frequency, this can confuse the general surgeon as it coexists with acute appendicitis. We present the case of a 58-year-old male patient, with abdominal pain of 5 days of evolution, with symptoms that are not very specific for the specific diagnosis of appendicitis. Computed tomography of the abdomen was performed with findings of acute appendicitis and mesenteric venous thrombosis with a clot of 11.5 cm. An open appendectomy was performed and anticoagulation was started on hospital discharge.

EVALUATION OF CRP (C-REACTIVE PROTEIN) AND PROCALCITONIN AS DIAGNOSTIC MARKERS IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS

Background: One of the most prevalent abdominal crises is acute appendicitis. Many efforts have been directed towards early diagnosis and intervention. Delay in diagnosis leads to increase morbidity and costs. Present study was aimed to evaluate the correlation of CRP and PCT with perioperative ?ndings in suspected cases of acute appendicitis and to ?nd whether they can aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Present Material and Methods: study was hospital based screening test study, conducted patients of age > 18 years, either gender, who presented with right iliac fossa pain lasting < 48 hours and were tentatively diagnosed with acute appendicitis, underwent surgery. Among Results: 115 patients with acute appendicitis, most of patients belong to age group of 21 to 30 years (45.2 %) followed by 31 to 40 and 10 to 20 years (18.3 %). Out of 115 patients 40 (34.8%) patients were females and 75 (65.2%) patients were males. CRP was positive in 84 (73.04%) and procalcitonin was positive in 66 (57.39%) patients with acute appendicitis. CRP had a sensitivity of 72.82%, a speci?city of 25%, a positive predictive value of 89.29%, and a negative predictive value of 9.68 %. Procalcitonin had a sensitivity of 57.28 %, a speci?city of 41.67 %, a positive predictive value of 89.39 %, and a negative predictive value of 10.20%. Conclusion: Elevation in CRP as well as procalcitonin levels only cannot be used for ?nal diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but it can act as an adjunct when evaluating the available clinical and laboratory

Modified Alvarado score versus Tzanaki’s Score in diagnosing acute appendicitis: An observational study

Background: Appendix is a blind muscular tube derived from the midgut. During the embryogenic development, in the 6th week appendix and cecum appear as out pouching from midguts caudal limb. Acute appendicitis is one the most common diagnosis made whenever patient presents with right illac fossa pain and mostly encountered in young and middle-aged individuals. The diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis depend on clinical presentation, that is, clinical signs and symptoms. The most common presentations in these cases have abdominal pain along with fever, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. Various Scoring systems are developed to diagnose acute appendicitis based mainly on the presenting signs and symptoms, but widely none of them are used as an uniform scoring system. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess effectiveness and comparison of modified Alvarado score and Tzanaki’s Score in the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was done in department of General Surgery JLN Medical College Hospital, Ajmer which included 200 patients presenting with the signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis, clinically. During admission the patients were evaluated by Modified Alvarado score and Tzanaki’s Score and final surgical decision was taken by the treating surgeon. Finally, the scores were compared with the histopathological examination of the surgically operated specimen. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of Modified Alvarado Score was 84.26% and 72.7%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 96.15% and negative predictive value of 36.3%. The sensitivity and specificity of Tzanaki’s score was 88.2% and 72.7%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 96.31% and negative predictive value of 43.24%. The diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado score was 83% and that of Tzanaki’s score was 86.5%. Conclusions: Our study showed that Modified Alvarado scoring system is a simple tool with limited features for bedside diagnosis of acute appendicitis, but its effectiveness is not as good as that of Tzanaki’s scoring system.

Apendicitis aguda no complicada en situs inversus totalis. Reporte de un caso

Introducción: El situs inversus totalis es una malformación congénita rara, caracterizado por una posición invertida de los órganos torácicos y abdominales, influyendo negativamente en la aproximación diagnóstica y en el tratamiento quirúrgico. Reporte: Se diagnosticó apendicitis aguda en un paciente varón de 28 años que conocía su anormalidad anatómica y se corroboró con imágenes tomográficas y la exploración laparoscópica. Ingresó a emergencia con 30 horas de dolor abdominal con inicio en epigastrio y posterior irradiación hacia la fosa iliaca izquierda. La tomografía confirmó su condición de situs inversus totalis y signos patológicos en la apendicitis localizada en FII; se realizó la intervención por laparoscopia sin complicaciones. Discusión: En pacientes con dolor en el cuadrante inferior izquierdo es importante un adecuado diagnóstico diferencial y el conocimiento previo de una anormalidad anatómica comunicada oportunamente hace viable un diagnóstico adecuado y una resolución quirúrgica exitosa.

Introduction: Situs inversus totalis is a rare congenital malformation, characterized by an inverted position of the thoracic and abdominal organs, negatively influencing the diagnostic approach and surgical treatment. Report: Acute appendicitis was diagnosed in a 28-year-old male patient who knew his anatomical abnormality and was corroborated with tomographic images and laparoscopic exploration. He was admitted to the emergency room with 30 hours of abdominal pain with onset in the epigastrium and subsequent radiation to the left iliac fossa. The tomography confirmed his condition of situs inversus totalis and pathological signs in localized appendicitis in FII; The laparoscopic intervention was performed without complications. Discusions: In patients with pain in the left lower quadrant, an adequate differential diagnosis is important and prior knowledge of an anatomical abnormality communicated in a timely manner, that makes feasible an adequate diagnosis and successful surgical resolution.

Apendicitis aguda en una gestante lúpica / Acute appendicitis in pregnant lupus

El lupus eritematoso sistémico es una enfermedad autoinmune que se caracteriza por un proceso inflamatorio crónico y el aumento de la producción de autoanticuerpos como mecanismos patogénicos. Se presenta con mayor frecuencia en pacientes femeninas y en edad fértil. La gestación en pacientes con esta enfermedad se considera como una condición de extrema precaución, ya que existe influencia de la gestación en la actividad clínica del lupus y del lupus en la evolución de la gestación. Las complicaciones quirúrgicas, como es el caso de una apendicitis aguda, aportan mayor riesgo al binomio madre-feto. El objetivo del presente trabajo es comunicar la experiencia de tratamiento de una paciente de 31 años de edad, con diagnóstico de lupus eritematoso sistémico y a quien a las 35,6 semanas de gestación se le presentó un cuadro de apendicitis aguda que no solo provocó la actividad de la enfermedad, sino que causó la interrupción de la gestación. La paciente y el recién nacido presentaron una evolución favorable sin complicaciones posteriores.

Systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease that includes the presence of a chronic inflammatory process and increased production of autoantibodies as etiopathogenic mechanisms. As a disease, it occurs more frequently in female patients and those of childbearing age. Pregnancy in patients with this disease is considered an element of extreme caution since there is an influence of pregnancy on the clinical activity of lupus and lupus on the evolution of pregnancy. The presence of surgical complications, as is the case of acute appendicitis, brings greater risk to the mother-fetus binomial. The objective of this report is to communicate the treatment experience of a 31-year-old patient, diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus and who at 35.6 weeks of gestation presented acute appendicitis that not only causes disease activity, but it generates the need to interrupt the pregnancy. The patient and the newborn had a favorable evolution, with no subsequent complications.

Evaluation of Necessity of Appendectomy After Conservative Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in Children

Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergency clinical conditions among children. It has two-way treatment options, one is surgical procedures, and another is a conservative approach. In the modern arena conservative treatment approach for acute appendicitis is one of the most preferred options. The aim of the study was to find out the solution to clinical conditions and reduce the procedure of injudicious appendectomy.Material & Methods:This prospective observational study was carried out at the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka to assess the necessity of appendectomy following conservatively managed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. A total of 62 children with uncomplicated acute appendicitis were included in the study. Then a conservative treatment started with the combination of inj. Ceftriaxone (100 mg/kgper day), inj. Metronidazole (1.5 mg/kg/ tds) and inj. Amikacin (7.5 mg/kg/ bd) therapy for five days with associated supportive management. The patients were assessed after 24 hours of treatment, who responded to the above management were the continued for same treatment at least five days then discharged and were followed up for 6 months.Results:Mean age was 8.95 ± 2.10 years within range from 4 years12 years. The male-female ratio was 1.58:1. The mean duration of hospital stay was 5.26 ± 0.63 days. On day 5, 59 (95.1%) were discharged and 3 (4.9%) underwent surgery during the conservative treatment period. A total of 8(13of .0%) cases have recurred during the first 6 months after treatment. Conclusions:Antibiotic treatment in patients with acute appendicitis is quite effective, the success rate is 95.1% during the period of treatment, and the recurrence rate is 13.0%.

Role Of Raised C-Reactive Protein (CRP) As the Indicator for Surgical Intervention in Clinically Diagnosed Acute Appendicitis

Background: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis relies more on the clinical acumen of the surgeon than on the investigations. As the condition is associated with an acute-phase reaction the analysis of WBC, neutrophil percentage and serum level of CRP has been demonstrated to be important diagnostic tools. Surprisingly the level of CRP becomes proportionately raised with increasing severity of the histopathological variety of the appendix. Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to compare the preoperative CRP level with postoperative histological findings and find out a predictive value of CRP as an indicator for surgical intervention in acute appendicitis.Material & Methods:It was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study executed in the Department of Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January to December of 2015 where 107 patients were included in this study. Preoperative level of CRP and WBC count was done in all selected patients. Histopathological severity of the resected specimen of the appendix was determined postoperatively. The correlation between preoperative clinical factors and the actual histological severity and identification of surgical indication markers was assessed to determine whether only the CRP level significantly differs between the surgical treatment necessary group and the possible non-surgical treatment group.Results:54% (58) of the patients were female out of a total of 107. Peak incidence (25.2%) was in the 16-20 years age group. Neither age nor gender had any significance with the type of appendicitis. Among the patients 28.1% (30) had gangrenous appendicitis. In patients with histopathologically proven acute appendicitis, both the WBC count and serum CRP level were raised. But only the CRP level significantly differs between gangrenous appendicitis and uncomplicated appendicitis (p-value<0.0001). The specificity and sensitivity of serum CRP for gangrenous appendicitis were 97% and 71% respectively. The ROC curve indicated that the cutoff value of CRP for gangrenous appendicitis is 6.2 mg/dl. Conclusions:A normal pre-operative serum CRP measurement in patients with suspected acute appendicitis is most likely associated with a normal or uncomplicated inflammation of the appendix. The rate of unnecessary appendectomies would probably reduce in this patient group by deferring surgery. Only the CRP level is consistent with the severity of appendicitis and can be considered to be a surgical indication marker for acute appendicitis.

Abdomen agudo quirúrgico relacionado con síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico asociado a covid-19 en pediatría: reporte de caso / Acute surgical abdomen related to multisystem inflamatory syndrome associated with covid-19 in pediatrics

Resumen En el contexto de la enfermedad por el nuevo coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, se ha descrito una afección poco usual denominada síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico en niños, asociada a COVID-19, en la cual los síntomas más frecuentes son los gastrointestinales. El dolor abdominal agudo severo se presenta hasta en un 60 % de los casos, requiriendoprincipalmente un diagnóstico diferencial con la apendicitis aguda. Se reporta el caso clínico de un adolescente quién presentó dolor abdominal, distensión, fiebre y diarrea, con proteína C reactiva muy elevada y hallazgos tomográficos compatibles con apendicitis aguda, por lo que se llevó a cirugía. Fue diagnosticado posteriormente con la enfermedad mencionada, tras reconsultar con fiebre y dolor abdominal. La apendicitis aguda en este síndrome se asocia con isquemia por la vasculitis intestinal y es una complicación inmunológica potencialmente mortal que debe considerarse por riesgo de perforación intestinal.

Abstract In the context of the disease caused by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, an unusual condition called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children associated with COVID-19 has been described, and its most common symptoms are gastrointestinal. Severe acute abdominal pain occurs in up to 60% of cases, requiring mainly a differential diagnosis with acute appendicitis. It is described the clinical case of an adolescent who presented abdominal pain, bloating, fever and diarrhea, with very high C-reactive protein and tomographic findings compatible with acute appendicitis, for which he underwent surgery. He was later diagnosed with the disease, after consulting again with fever and abdominal pain. Acute appendicitis related to this syndrome is associated with ischemia due to intestinal vasculitis and is a life-threatening immunological complication due to the risk of intestinal perforation.

Diverticulitis apendicular, como diagnóstico diferencial / Appendiceal diverticulitis as differential diagnosis

RESUMEN La diverticulitis apendicular (DA) es una patología poco frecuente, considerada clínicamente indistinguible de la apendicitis aguda, aunque podría presentar una sintomatología más leve. Este es el caso de un paciente masculino de 59 años, que concurre al Servicio de Urgencias presentando signos y síntomas sugestivos de una apendicitis aguda; una ecografía informa un asa tubular parcialmente compresible de 7,8 mm de diámetro y una fina banda de líquido laminar, compatible con proceso apendicular agudo. La apendicectomía se realizó de manera convencional evidenciándose un apéndice inflamado principalmente en su región distal. La histología reveló diverticulitis apendicular complicada con rotura. El paciente evolucionó favorablemente y se externó a las 24 horas. Existe una asociación de DA y neoplasia apendicular, por lo que se recomienda una colonoscopia y el seguimiento de este tipo de pacientes.

ABSTRACT Appendiceal diverticulitis (AD) is a rare condition considered clinically identical to acute appendicitis although it may present milder symptoms. We report the case of a 59-year-old male patient who visited the emergency department due to signs and symptoms suggestive of acute appendicitis. An abdominal ultrasound showed partially compressible tubular loop with a diameter of 7.8 mm and a thin band of laminar fluid, consistent with acute appendiceal process. During conventional appendectomy the appendix had signs of inflammation, mainly in the distal region. The histology revealed appendiceal diverticulitis complicated with rupture. The patient had favorable outcome and was discharged 24 hours later. As, there is a clear association between AD and appendiceal neoplasms, colonoscopy and patient monitoring is recommended.

A Clinical Study and Management of Non Traumatic Acute Abdomen

Background: The acute abdomen is a condi?on that demands urgent a?en?on and treatment, ranging from trivial to life threatening condi?ons. The aim of this study was to know in detail the epidemiology and outcome in nontrauma?c acute abdomen. Methods: An ins?tu?on based, cross-sec?onal study was conducted from December 2019 to April 2020, at Department of General Surgery Govt. Medical College Kota Rajasthan. The study included 100 cases of non-trauma?c abdomen. Results: Non- trauma?c acute abdominal pain was more common in 2ndto 6thdecade of life. The males to female ra?o is 2.85:1. Hollow viscus perfora?on (30%) forms the commonest cause of acute abdomen followed by acute appendici?s, Sub acute intes?nal obstruc?on, renal/ureteric colic, cholelithiasis, pancrea??s, non-specific pain abdomen, OBG related pathology, liver abscess, Meckel’s diver?culi?s and splenic abscess in 24%, 23%, 8%, 4%, 3%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 1% and 1% respec?vely. Sixteen pa?ents managed conserva?vely. Most common surgical procedures done were exploratory laparotomy with needful for hollow viscus perfora?on and open/laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendici?s. Conclusions: Proper history taking, clinical examina?on with suppor?ve imaging findings are most important to narrow the differen?al diagnosis and for immediate interven?on to limit morbidity and mortality.

Histopathological Analysis of Biopsy Cases Processed at Diagnostic Centers of PAF Faisal And Masroor Hospital - A Prospective Study

Background: Histopathological patterns help to define the orientation as well as the duration of disease. The findings identified through this tool aids in the identification and selection of treatment modality as well as provides a prognostic assessment of the condition. Methods: A prospective study design was opted for this research. A total of 221 patients from either gender, ages between 31 to 38 years, undergoing different types of surgical procedures were en rolled from the Faisal and Masroor Base Hospital, Karachi Pakistan. After receiving consent, a biopsy specimen was taken and transferred to the laboratory for staining and further processing for histopathological examination. Results: The major findings i solated among specimens constituted of samples from the Appendix; 67.87% (150/221) followed by stomach; 18.10% (40/221). Among the appendix specimens, 82% (41/221) patients were suffering from acute appendicitis and the remaining had peri - appendicitis. Ami d the stomach specimens 65% (26/221) patients were diagnosed with (Mild) Chronic Superficial Gastritis, followed by 20% (8/221) patients with H - Pylori associated (Mild) Chronic Superficial Gastritis and the remaining were normal gastric antrum and chronic gastritis with partial villous atrophy. Conclusion: By using histopathological examination, the outcome of many diseases can be determined at an earlier stage thereby assisting in lowering the levels of morbidity and mortality among the population. In our research we were able to distinguish a variety of infections among different areas/ organs of the body.

Are thiol-disulfide homeostasis & neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio useful in the differential diagnosis of acute familial Mediterranean fever attacks & acute appendicitis?

Background & objectives: Continuous subclinical inflammation can be seen in patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) during the attack-free period. The importance of oxidative stress parameters in acute appendicitis (AA) progression has also been shown in previous studies. So, oxidative stress and the oxidant/antioxidant balance may play a role in this persistent subclinical inflammation. With this background the main objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of combining the thiol-disulfide homeostasis parameters and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the differential diagnosis of AA and an acute FMF attack. Methods: The present study was conducted prospectively with 84 patients who were admitted to the emergency department between May 1, and December 31, 2018. Another 40 healthy individuals were assigned as the control group. The homeostasis parameters of thiol-disulfide were measured by a spectrophotometric method and NLR was measured in the patient and control groups. Results: Native thiol and total thiol values were lower, while disulfide values were insignificantly higher in patients with AA than in patients with FMF. The white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil and NLR values were significantly higher in the AA group (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively). When the neutrophil cut-off value for AA was set at 8.55, the calculated sensitivity was 80 per cent, the specificity was 72.2 per cent, and the area under the curve was 0.837. Interpretation & conclusions: The results of this study suggest that neutrophil, WBC and NLR values can be useful in the differentiation of AA from an acute FMF attack.

Application of multi-slice spiral CT and abdominal ultrasound in clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the application value of multi-slice spiral CT and abdominal ultrasound methods in the clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.Methods:We included 50 children patients who were pathologically diagnosed with acute appendicitis by the Department of Surgery, Dongyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital from August 2016 to August 2019. Before surgery, all patients underwent multi-slice spiral CT and abdominal ultrasound examinations. We recorded the time taken to complete multi-slice spiral CT and abdominal ultrasound examinations. Taking pathological results as the diagnosis criteria, we also calculated the coincidence rate of each imaging method.Results:The time we took to complete multi-slice spiral CT examination was shorter than that for abdominal ultrasound examination [(13.34 ± 3.86) minutes vs. (23.45 ± 4.77) minutes, t = 11.65, P < 0.05]. The coincidence rate of multi-slice spiral CT in identifying acute simple appendicitis, acute phlegmonous appendicitis, and acute gangrenous appendicitis was 95.24%, 95.00%, and 100.0%, respectively, and it was 71.73%, 70.00%, 88.89%, respectively for abdominal ultrasound examination. The coincidence rates in identifying acute simple appendicitis, acute phlegmonous appendicitis, and acute gangrenous appendicitis were significantly different between multi-slice spiral CT and abdominal ultrasound examinations ( χ2 = 4.29, 4.33, 1.06, all P < 0.05). Conclusion:Compared with abdominal ultrasound, multi-slice spiral CT is easier to operate, takes a shorter time in manipulation, provides more distinct images, and has a higher coincidence rate. Therefore, multi-slice spiral CT is of great diagnostic value for acute appendicitis in children.

Effects of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery on acute appendicitis in children / 中国基层医药

Objective:To investigate the effects of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery on acute appendicitis in children. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the data of 50 children with acute appendicitis who underwent surgery in Zhoushan Women and Children Hospital from December 2016 to December 2019. They were randomly divided into observation ( n = 27) and control ( n = 23) groups. The observation group underwent three-port laparoscopy. The control group underwent open surgery. Operation-related indicators, postoperative recovery, parental satisfaction, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results:Operative time was significantly longer in the observation group than in the control group [(56.57 ± 5.35) minutes vs. (40.23 ± 6.31) minutes, t = 9.78, P < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the observation group than in the control group [(10.11 ± 2.36) mL vs. (18.36 ± 3.21) mL, t = 10.45, P < 0.001]. Duration of pain was significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group [(1.23 ± 0.23) days vs. (2.98 ± 0.87) days, t = 10.06, P < 0.001). Time to postoperative exhaust was significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group [(21.39 ± 4.35) minutes vs. (39.88 ±5.39) minutes, t = 13.35, P < 0.001]. Time to defection was significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group [(50.12 ± 3.35) minutes vs. (61.23 ± 4.21) minutes, t = 10.33, P < 0.001]. Time to first diet was significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group [(13.25 ± 2.56) hours vs. (19.96 ± 2.67) hours, t = 9.07, P < 0.001]. Length of hospital stay in the observation group was significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group [(4.13 ± 1.12) days vs. (7.98 ± 1.96) days, t = 8.53, P < 0.001). Parental satisfaction was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group [96.30% vs. 47.83%, χ2 = 13.360, P < 0.001]. The incidence of complications was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group [7.41% vs. 52.17%, χ2 = 10.58, P < 0.001]. Conclusion:Laparoscopic surgery is superior and safer to open surgery in the treatment of acute appendicitis in children.

Ultrasonographic findings of child acute appendicitis incorporated into a scoring system

INTRODUCTION@#This study aimed to investigate the ultrasonographic features of paediatric acute appendicitis and incorporate them into a scoring algorithm that will quantify the risk of complications and the strength of recommendation for surgical intervention.@*METHODS@#179 patients with suspected appendicitis who had undergone ultrasonographic examination were included in this study. Based on their medical evaluation and post-surgical histopathological results, patients were categorised into confirmed appendicitis (n = 101) and non-appendicitis (n = 78) groups.@*RESULTS@#In the appendicitis group, the appendix was visualised in 66 (65.3%) patients. In cases where the appendix was not visualised, we looked out for secondary inflammatory signs, which were present in 32 (31.7%) patients. Using stepwise logistic regression, Blumberg's sign, free fluid or collection, hyperaemia, non-compressible appendix and an appendix diameter > 7 mm were found to be significant predictive factors for appendicitis. A new scoring system called POPs was developed, combining inflammatory predictors and ultrasonography findings, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.958 (95% confidence interval 0.929-0.986).@*CONCLUSION@#The newly developed POPs-based diagnosis scheme proved a promising alternative to existing scoring systems such as the Alvarado score. Although further calibration would be beneficial, the proposed scoring scheme is simple and easy to understand, memorise and apply in the emergency room.